Sunday, December 25, 2011

Into the Forest - the Value of Literary Myths for Personal Insights

When I was a little girl, like many children, I lived a divided life. Perhaps you remember your own. I separated a vivid fantasy life from a rather rigid attachment to absolute, concrete truth.

On the one hand, I sleepwalked and sleeptalked and had powerful dreams. I spun elaborate fantasy games in which I was, of course, the heroine. I firmly believed in ghosts.

Many children decide at some point, probably in order to discount the possibility of parental sex as well as to dismiss ANY genetic connection to their parents, that they are REALLY adopted. In my case, because I really WAS adopted, I KNEW, with TOTAL assurance, that my absent mother was going to come and whisk me away on the eve of my birthday. Depending on how well I was getting along with my Mom that year, I envisioned this nighttime visitor as either a horrible harridan or a beautiful princess, either one with magical powers. On those years when I yearned for her, I would sit up by my window, waiting. When I dreaded her arrival, I would boobytrap my room or invent some excuse to sleep in my parents' room, although I sadly feared that they would be too weak to protect me from my doom.

Many children ask a lot of questions to find order in the universe. The books I chose to read as a child had to answer YES to the question, "Is it true, MOM?": encyclopedias, for example, and those red and blue bound sets of biographies found in school and public libraries. I started at the A's and went right on through: Clara Barton, Founder of the Red Cross; Helen Keller, Humitarian (probably read when I thought I would go blind).

But by the time I reached 10 or 11, the alphabetical biographies and encyclopedias no longer served their purpose of providing order in the universe. True though they might be, their content seemed remote and rather simple, whereas my little life was immediate and becoming overwhelming. These neatly packaged truths did nothing to impede the chaos that seemed to engulf me. My body and emotional life were changing, of course, and even more pressing at the time, my brother had begun to walk, throwing and destroying most inanimate objects in his path, like Godzilla in diapers.

What suddenly appealed to me were those volumes of fairy tales titled by color: The Blue Fairy Book, the Silver, the Yellow, I moved the set into my room and poured over the books. I even asked fewer questions at dinner because these books did not raise vexing questions. Instead, they comforted me and thrilled me. As the central character in my rather theatrical version of life, I felt like every motherless princess I read about. I, too, was besieged by three little demons (siblings) who existed in order to menace my life. Like these heroes and heroines, I too, felt betrayed by the powers I relied on. Imagine my disillusionment when my parents displayed a discomforting inability to protect me from childhood sorrows or predict some holiday disaster. Imagine my discouragement when my sincere prayers, made in good faith, to hit a baseball, to fly, to become invisible, were stonily ignored. Like the characters in these rich tales, found surprising allies, like the childless old crones of my neighborhood, or so they seemed at the time, who ALWAYS bought my Girl Scout cookies, ALWAYS stayed home Halloween night and offered GOOD candy, and ALWAYS helped me every spring to find the mittens I had lost in their snowy yards. These hero tales were my stories. They comforted by acknowledging my grievances and disappointments and self‑doubts. They held out the hope for unexpected help, discovered wisdom, secret caches of weaponry by which to torture my siblings, and well deserved treasures like Christmas presents bought early and hidden.

What I came to realize and would like to share with you, is that life is not so neatly divided into Capital T TRUTH and capital F FANTASY, but rather into several kinds of small t truths and many ways of illuminating those truths. The nonfiction addressed numerous facts, to be sure, and they offered insight into the world but not into myself, with which, like anyone growing up, I was starting to become confused.  For the comforting sense of self‑discovery and of warm connection to others, I recommend the world's rich resource of fairy tales, myths, and stories, particularly hero quests, to be found, in part, in the world's religious traditions.
***
The importance of religious stories is NOT whether each quote, each passage is divinely revealed, literal truth, albeit in thousands of years of translations. And it is on this very point that I feel sad when I hear the arguments of BOTH fundamentalists and those religious liberals (who would adamantly deny any similarity to one another) who cling to an historical and literary "all or nothing" approach to religious writings. To defend OR dismiss such full bodied stories BECAUSE they are true or BECAUSE they are false misses the point. Our own world experience is not so neatly divided.  Memories of beloved or fearsome fictional characters, for example, are often MORE vivid than our recollection of real people, and often teach us lessons that last longer than those imparted by our three dimensional friends. The point is that these stories do not promise CAPITAL T truths for all people and all moments any more than the encyclopedia does. Rather they offer a rich, resonating, mythological direction to a truth which a reader may need and may discover.

Hero stories, both fiction and nonfiction, tell the same story, speaking to the achingly familiar experiences of their readers.

Most hero stories conform to a set sequence of 4 episodes, with additions, deletions, and variations that make each story special. In general, the episodes are these: a young hero is compelled by circumstances usually beyond his control to undertake a dangerous journey through a strange land. There he must defend himself against evil characters and betrayals, usually with the unexpected aid of some surprising ally. Once he has dispatched the bad guy, the hero wins some treasure, which often includes wisdom, honor, and love. This he must remove from the strange land and take back to civilization and share with others for a satisfactory conclusion.

This format fits such religious heroes as Moses, Buddha, Mohammed, and Jesus. It also corresponds to such great classic heroes as Heracles, Aeneas, and Gilgamesh. It even fits Little Red Riding Hood, Dorothy in Oz and virtually every plucky detective. Significantly, it encompasses many recent heroes, too, like Ben Franklin.

Like this remarkable cast of characters, we too, feel challenged and vulnerable, treading alone through our personal forests, caught without adequate tools or preparation. "If only that experience had occurred to me later in life", we think, "perhaps I could have handled it better."

But one of the inevitable aspects of misfortune IS bad timing. No one says, “now would be a good time to lose a job” or “I choose today to develop a disease.” We are invariably caught off guard. We feel afraid, perhaps disappointed in ourselves. We may well feel angry or bitter. In hero myths, there is no pat answer to the why of life.

Bad, scary, evil things just happen. They happen to you and your children and your friends. Your enemies, too, if that is any consolation. Analyzing why events occur to us may well be important for each of us at some point, but equally important AND validating is losing one's sense of isolated suffering. Grief, fear, and betrayals are social phenomena as well as personal tragedies. At the very least, misery loves company, and these stories provide that. At best, the reader finds tales that sympathetically mirror his own experiences and offer insight for threading through the thicket of life's difficulties.

The first of 4 components in these stories is that most heroes, like us, do not undertake their adventures lightly, or even by choice.  In fact, most start only in order to flee death, a symbolic motivation for all of us. Motherless Hansel and Gretel and Snow White flee wicked stepmothers who would kill them. Similarly, both Jesus and Moses undertake infant journeys to flee imperial decrees to kill the sons of the Jews, almost certainly untrue historically, but symbolic of any baby's and mother's first journey together. Both Moses and Heracles are forced on their way because they committed murder: Moses flees the country and Heracles is forced to pay reparations to the king in the form of ten extraordinary labors.

Let’s consider the application of these stories to our own situations.  Who has not experienced this strong flight sensation, the wish that everything would remain as it was two minutes ago but is no longer; that awful realization that something horrible has happened that compels us to embark we know not where and to we know not what end? A child suddenly injured, damaging words or acts irretrievably said or done, terrible news received and no clock to turn back. These are the awful moments that divide our lives into temporal segments, with everything identified no longer by date but by phrases like "That was before I was diagnosed" or "That was after she died.” Some people even use the term, "my new life" or "my second life". Indeed, these ARE initiations into a new life, a new journey.

The second component is the journey, and very significantly, in NONE of these stories is the trip easy. Our heroes are fought, captured, tricked and tempted by formidable evil characters. They are also betrayed or ignored by powers they believed in. Heracles lived a life so difficult and had to perform labors so perversely chosen that when he died, burned alive by his own wife, Zeus raised him to Olympus as a god. Snow White and Sleeping Beauty, like more contemporary anti‑heroes, are mercilessly pursued by evil witches, who, failing to kill them, condemn them to long lasting semi‑deaths. The lengthy Harry Potter epic details the trials and tribulations of his journey from the whipping boy of the Dursleys to a destined battle with Lord Voldemort. In both the codified scriptures and the religious folklore of their religions, Jesus, Moses and Buddha are tempted by every human torment imaginable. Jesus, of course, is tortured and killed by both secular and religious factions representing two aspects of life. He then descends to Hell and returns to the earth, like Aeneas, and also ascends to heaven, representing the unification of the three ancient worlds: earth, heaven, and the underworld, under the jurisdiction of one god.

Many characters are defeated, often betrayed, only to fight again years later. Certainly this was the bitter experience of the Jews exiled in Babylon. During the golden years of David's and Solomon's reigns, around 600 BC, the Jews developed a belief that they were the special, chosen people of a uniquely powerful god. Imagine their bitter humiliation when they were defeated by the infidel Babylonians, the capital beseiged, their people forcibly scattered. How impotent their god must have seemed as they watched His sacred home, Solomon's Temple, easily defiled and then razed to the ground. It is this pain that infuses so many of the Psalms. In fact, when he was the president of our denomination, John Buehrens, said that he never prepared for a funeral without first reading among those poems.

Ben Franklin was deceived three times by powerful men whom he trusted. Let me tell you the most egregious case. Governor Keith of Pennsylvania befriended the clever young printer, then aged 18, inviting him frequently to his home and offering to set him up in the printing business. He encouraged Ben to take passage on a ship to London to procure better quality supplies which the governor would secure with letters of credit as well as letters of introduction. Once on board, the American coast rapidly receding behind him, Ben discovered that the governor had sent along neither letters nor money, and the young man, betrayed by one he had regarded with pride and faith as a benefactor, was abandoned 3000 miles away with no way to return home. Ben worked for several years in London among various printers to earn the money to limp home again, dreams dashed.

Other cases of betrayal involve Daniel and Jason. Jason abandoned his wife Medea who then kills their two children in crazed revenge. Daniel is thrown into the lion's den by coworkers of many years standing who resented his promotion to grandvizier for King Nebcadnezzar. It does not invalidate the power, the truth of these stories to talk about Daniel, Jason, and Ben Franklin as parallel stories.  In fact, I believe the latter PURPOSELY structured his autobiography to EMULATE such hero stories.  He was an accomplished writer, after all.

Life, and our partners in it, are often fickle. Which of these stories does NOT ring true for you? Fleeing defeated, with your tail between your legs, knowing that you will be compelled to fight the same battle again? Feeling humiliated that something or someone you believed in has betrayed you or proved weak or unworthy? Being asked to perform functions you feel utterly incapable of fulfilling? These are not hollow stories, entertainments, opiates of the masses. We have met these characters and they are us.

The third component of these hero stories, following the reluctant start and the difficult path, is that our heroes are almost always aided by the least likely of allies. In fact, many helpers appear in the form of woodland creatures, tiny fairies, or superficially weak people. The Shoemaker's Elves are one example, Aesop’s Fables are full of them, and our first introduction to Yoda in the Star Wars movies makes use of this first impression proved wrong.  St. Christopher's old hermit and the seemingly small Christ child he carries across the river is, too. Certainly Oz is populated by a motley assortment of helpers for Dorothy.  The burning bush is another.  These allies often share a seemingly modest gift that turns out to be powerfully useful, like Moses’ staff, or magic words.

Pagan, Jewish, and Christian folklore are replete with stories of a god or angel disguised as a peasant, child, or animal. Good fortune comes to him who honors the humble visitor, misfortune befalls him who doesn't

These stories represent our tendency to undervalue others, particularly those we don't recognize as important or as like ourselves. What enslaved Hebrew would have expected liberation from an Egyptian prince named Moses? What Arab would have foreseen that Mohammed, of all people, who married a rich widow twice his age to become a very successful merchant, would retreat to the mountains to receive the divine sutras? What Indian would imagine that any prince would leave the pampered life of a palace for the monastic life of physical denial chosen by Buddha? And finally, how ironic that the most sustained Jewish messianic figure to emerge out of the many that appeared during the two centuries beginning this common era, would be NOT the expected military or political hero but a backwater preacher with a short ministry who was ignominiously killed by his own religious leaders.

Have you ever enjoyed some of those serendipitous moments of grace or revelation from a stranger or from someone you least expected? Someone who says exactly what you needed to hear and at precisely the right moment? Even better, each of you meets the needs of the other, connecting somehow, in a deep and resonating way; passengers on a plane, perhaps, never to meet again, or someone you have known for a while but never really noticed. These rich encounters pale in the telling, don't they? "I met this woman," you might begin, "and we started talking and she said ... and I said ... and she knew just what I meant and I understood her. It was as though we spoke shorthandSomehow your world view brightens.

The fourth and final episode of these stories, both of the heroes and of ourselves, is that the hero must leave the strange land in order to claim the treasure and fulfill the responsibilities that await him after his difficult journey. St. Paul makes the point that the Jesus story would be meaningless if he had not risen again. Protestant churches reinforce this by displaying empty crosses, stressing his resurrection, his conquering of death, in heroic fashion. Aeneas descended to Hades to speak with his beloved father, but he must return to earth in order to found Rome with the wisdom he gained below. Snow White and Sleeping Beauty's princes must lead them out of the forest to their own kingdoms, representing civilization, where they will now reign magnanimously. In many traditions, ranging from medicine men to psychotherapy, people undergo trances, a semi-death state to return to the past or some other source of wisdom, and must return to this world to relay to others the wisdom of their mental journey, and to live differently because of it.

The many reported near‑death experiences mirror this too. The experiencer travels through a tunnel illuminated at the end. There he meets a beneficent figure who is variously named, according to the religious tradition of the person. In this lighted place he gains insight into his life from flashbacks or loved ones he meets, and, like Ebenezer Scrooge, feels compelled to return to life in order to make changes based on his experience.

People I have spoken with who have undergone some transforming experience seem to feel similarly compelled to share it with others. This might be as simple as showing baby pictures to every person in a restaurant, because for some parents, the birth of their child is a mystical experience, although personally, that is not what I would call it. Support groups are predicated on this conclusion too. People whose second life, as many call it, begins with cancer, or the birth or death of a child, or sobriety, often need to discuss their journeys: the beginnings, the battles and betrayals, the unexpected grace notes, the light at the end of the tunnel that they have seen or hope to find.

Your lives, your futures are like this too, of course. Together here at church, and separately as well, we hope to find guidance, assurance, wisdom as we stumble from one adventure to another, EVEN when we feel most reluctant to embark on them. Sometimes we actually stride purposely toward one goal only to find, like St. Christopher, that we were looking in the wrong place all along. Other times we are overconfident in the skills we have, like Prince Five Weapons, or in the people we trust, like Ben Franklin, only to discover their limits. At times like this we will find help from one of two untapped resources: overlooked, undervalued allies or ourselves. With that help we can leave the forest and proceed with a renewed sense of purpose and responsibility.

These hero quests in the Bible, fairy tales, novels are not "Helpful Hints from Grimm" of “7 Habits of highly Effective Heroes." They are just real life, capital R, Capital L, with the spirit of life left intact for each of us to discover, and apply.

Saturday, December 24, 2011

First Winter Visit, Before Building

When visiting the area with his dad, before buying the property, Bryan had scrutinized the full time neighbors to ensure that they weren’t some weirdo Unibomber survivalists, and they checked him out, too, to make sure he wasn’t some escaped convict from the lower 48.  Then it was my turn for inspection of both the property and our neighbors.  We flew up in March, spending the coldest week I have ever experienced (-30 degrees), renting one of the guest cabins owned by the full timers.

The Cessna ski-plane flight in March from Anchorage over the Cook Inlet was gorgeous.  The near shore ice forms a kaleidoscope of pieces that form and break and reform with the tide, refracting the light.  It is one of my favorite views.  Beyond that, the initial trip was pretty sobering.   My first impression was that there was NOTHING down there, mile after mile.  Certainly no roads (which meant no electrical lines or plumbing either), and very few, scattered cabins, among which only a few sported smoke curling up from the chimneys.  The frozen lakes, and what I later learned were extensive bogs, were traversed by dozens of snowmobile tracks (called snow machines in Alaska) carved by intrepid people enjoying all day treks with a picnic, an extra can of gasoline, and an emergency pack of supplies and matches in case they fell through thin ice or got lost or stranded. 

The plane landed on the lake ice in front of the only cabins visible along the lake.  Two, homeschooled teenage sons and their dogs greeted us and carted our gear in plastic sleds to one of their winterized, rustic, hand built guest cabins which felt warm and cozy after the chilly flight.  I was eager to meet this family that would become our neighbors and they, it turns out, were curious about us.  This family, whom we found absolutely delightful, and the owners of the two other residences on the lake (seasonal hunting/fishing cabins) were absolutely essential to our ability to learn all the lessons we needed to transition to this very different, remote, rural lifestyle, just as they had done many years ago.   I’ve never asked them, but I bet they thought we’d give up as we showed again and again how naïve we were about, well, everything:  food, transport, temperatures, healthcare, dangers.   

I am not sure whether going in March was the best idea or not.  On the one hand, it was sooooo cold.  What a contrast from south Texas!  Fortunately, our hosts bought for us used bunny boots, which are double or triple layers of rubber with air bladders in between.  They look like something Ronald McDonald would wear but wawrmth trumps fashion in my view and my feet have never been cold in them in any the ensuing years I have worn them.  We bought clothes we thought would be warm enough and our hosts discreetly supplemented where our purchases fell short, like every time we went snow machining with them!  The setting was stunning, we got to try moose steaks for the first time, carved off the frozen carcass hanging outside the barn, complete with a squished bullet in one of them.  We eagerly listened to some of their learning experiences as they had developed their property and lifestyle from a previously suburban existence.  On this visit, I enjoyed delicious home cooked meals of great variety and learned that, yes, I could survive an outhouse at 30 below as long as it had a polystyrene toilet seat.  I also discovered that I very much enjoyed the natural beauty and silence of a remote location – something I have since discovered is very disturbing to some other people.  I was particularly impressed by the contentedness of the family that hosted us.   

During that week, the father took us on snow machine excursions to visit some of the other remote cabins and their owners.  We also saw some of the buildings he had built for these neighbors and for his own family.   Although he was retired military (like many people in Alaska), he discovered a previously untapped woodworking skill once he moved out to the bush.  We were quite impressed by his craftsmanship, evident from both construction and art carvings.  By the end of the week, we asked him if he would build a cabin for us.  Since most of his construction projects for others were, by necessity, remote, our commission surely must have appealed to him as the shortest commute he could possibly have. 

He offered us two alternatives:  he could assemble a “kit house,” as he had done for others, if we had the materials flown in by helicopter, or he could build from local spruce he would cut and haul and strip if we bought a log mill that he could use on site for construction.  The costs of either alternative seemed so high for the little cabin we envisioned that we considered an all-weather yurt as an alternative.  However, he recommended a clever friend who, like many Alaskans we have met, could build something from nothing, and in this case, could build a log mill for a reasonable price.  Since the idea of a log cabin built from our own trees was far more appealing than a “Lincoln log” generic house, and since hiring a helicopter to deliver “kit logs” would cost thousands of dollars to deliver what would be a generic product, Bryan checked references and agreed to pay $14,000 for the “mill” that would be hauled in pieces by snow machine sled and reassemble on site before the construction season.  Once assembled on site, the mill looked like a 15 foot metal roof beam horizontally supported about seven feet above ground.  From the top dangled a pulley system of chains that support a log.  Two Honda car tires and a small generator propel the log along so he can plane them into useful sizes for decking and door panels. 

We three designed a simple two story log cabin, with dimensions of 16 x 24 inside with two 10 x 16 covered porches facing south (toward the lake) and a 6 foot wide utility porch on the back.  Our neighbor figured he could cut the trees that winter, age them, strip them the next summer and build the cabin over the ensuing year.   He would haul in by snow machine sled some of the supplies needed for initial construction before the snow got too soft in April.  Other supplies we would need to bring in by plane during the summer or snow machine next winter.  We started developing a long list.

At this point, I felt like we were checking off items on Maslow’s hierarchy:  we had land with fresh water/fish and plenty of fuel, now we would build shelter, too.   Additional construction projects would accumulate over the next three years, such as an outhouse, a storage shed for food and another shed for tools, a fuel depot, a power tower with solar, wind, telephone booster, and a shower house.   Some of these our neighbor built for us, and some we built ourselves or with others. 

Friday, December 23, 2011

Internal "Reality Check" Financial Planning for Entrepreneurs

Entrepreneurs are, by nature, visionary and optimistic.  Their company valuations are high and prospects are rosy.  Perhaps as a result, many may be wooed by pie-in-the sky investment discussions that never result in bona fide term sheets while discouraging realistic but less complimentary offers, which, in their estimation, undervalue the business and their management skills. 

For these reasons, I recommend that the entrepreneurial management teams discuss the following five tough questions amongst themselves and update a file of written answers for their eyes only as the company fortunes wax or wane. This “reality check” will help them ask investors and investment bankers discerning questions earlier than they might otherwise do, and will enable them to determine in advance the value of particular offering terms at various points in the company’s future.

Question 1:  If the company has no other clients or revenue sources other than those currently active, how long can it sustain its burn-rate?

Analysis:  Entrepreneurs may project fantastic valuations after “this” or “that” milestone, but investors and other financial sources also evaluate the present, so entrepreneurs should, too.  The more immediate a company’s need for money, the less sense it makes to spend time and effort seeking private equity and the more sense it makes for the company to spend time hawking its widgets to paying customers or increasing its profit margin.  Due diligence will always take longer than a financially strapped company wants, and its financial vulnerability will be obvious to the investor, who will either regard that deal as risky enough to abandon or risky enough to offer less than the entrepreneur needs or at terms the entrepreneur will likely regard as onerous.  

 To Do:  Figure out how long the company can remain in business with no investment and nothing other than organic growth.  Calculate the cost of the number of months required to turn a profit and repay debt.  This is the amount of money the company needs (vs. wants).  How much of the company would you sell to an investor or how much interest would pay on a loan that carried you through this time period?  

Question 2:  How time sensitive is your financial need? 

Analysis: Some companies face seasonal or cyclical highs or once-in-a-blue-moon marketing or sales opportunities they must hit or they are doomed.  Others enjoy a competitive advantage that is significant, but not for long, so they could make more money expanding rapidly now than growing organically later.  In such cases, money invested or loaned now is worth much more than money invested or loaned later.  Calculate a bonus value for the money.  

To Do:  Look at a calendar and identify a date before which investment is highly valued. Determine what you are willing to give up or pay to get an offer by that date.

 Question 3:  Under what investment terms are you willing to sell 51% of the company, step aside from a management role, or give up a Board seat?     

Analysis:  Many investors have a clear and public preference for roles, such as majority or minority control, a Board seat, their own management team in place.  Know their preferences and what you will accept.  Also, smart money is worth more than “dumb” money – that is to say that investors who know the industry, and have sales, merger, or vendor contracts can bring terrific value in addition to needed dollars.

To Do:  Think about all the resources the company needs to grow – not just money.  Calculate the time/cost to achieve goals on your own vs. inheriting professional resources with investment dollars. What is that worth to you – what percentage of the company or what management role? 

Question 4:  What upcoming milestones will make the company cash flow positive?  How much time and money are required to meet the minimums?  

Analysis: Most private equity sources will not invest all promised funds up front.  Rather, they will release a portion to be followed by later tranches if the company meets identified milestones, usually in sales revenue or development. These increments and goals should be negotiated in the contract.

To Do:  Figure out various fast and cheap tracks to profitability.  Calculate the barebones cost to each and add 20% for extra time. Accepting less money in a first tranche decreases the likelihood of meeting the milestone, which means it decreases the second infusion of cash, and thereby increases the likelihood of losing the investor or even the company under the terms of the offering agreement, since the entrepreneur probably won’t have other potential investors in queue.

Question 5:  If all goes well and the company grows, at what point will expansion exceed the competency of current management?

Analysis:  Many entrepreneurs are great at starting companies but weaker at maintaining or growing them.  The success of the company may depend on recognizing management’s strengths and weaknesses.  For example, running a public company is different than running a private one.

 To Do: Develop a graceful transition and departure plan based on realistic self and company-assessment. 

You will notice that several of these questions approach the same question from different perspectives.  The gist is this, “if you cannot achieve your goals without investors, then the most important valuation to acknowledge is not how much the market will value your company when it is successful, but rather, how much you value the money to take you the first, steep step to get there.   

Grudge Management or UU Yom Kippur

Carl Thoresen, a professor at Stanford University, has studied the psycho-social factors connected with cardiovascular problems for more than 20 years.  He has also designed training programs that incorporate life changes to reduce health risks.  Recently, he solicited volunteers to participate in a forgiveness study, because he believes that people who  take less offense and pardon others show fewer symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and other physical symptoms.  But Thoresen’s study hit a glitch right away.  Although almost 200 people volunteered to participate, all of whom had an offense they were willing to consider forgiving, the vast majority of volunteers were women, not a diversified sample.  "Men just don't seem to connect with the term 'forgiveness,"' he said.  A simple name change, however, attracted droves of male volunteers.  He changed the title from "forgiveness training" to "grudge management!"  

Attitudes toward forgiveness, contrition, reconciliation, and grudges – reflect not only our gender and upbringing, but also our theologies.  As UUs, used to discussions like “Build your own theologies” we may have adjusted our religious or atheistic philosophies over time, but do we retain the forgiveness teachings of our youth?  Let’s test this on ourselves.  I will share a true story of a family that offers lots of opportunities for both grudges and forgiveness.  As I do, please think about how you would handle the situation.  After that story, I’ll share the clemency teachings of the five major world religions and the results of some scientific/academic studies about forgiveness.  At the end of the sermon, I’m to ask you to choose an approach and apply it, today, to one transgression for which you wish to be forgiven, and one transgression against you, by someone else you wish to forgive.   

*                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                 

A man I met on a church campout last year told me the following story, which was very much on his mind.  Fifty years ago, when his brother and he were toddlers, maybe 2 and 4 years old, their father abandoned the family and the parents divorced, apparently in absentia.  The boys had no further contact with him.  No cards, no child support, no extended family relations.  Their mother subsequently moved to Arizona and remarried, and the step-dad adopted them (since there was no contact with the father to dispute it) and gave them his last name.  This was particularly significant for the big brother, whose name had been junior.  Fast forward fifty years.  At a business convention, the big-brother heard a colleague extolling the virtues of the Internet for genealogical research.  Maybe some of you have enjoyed that hobby.  Not only was he able to research long dead ancestors, but also long lost relatives.  So, he decided to research his dad.   

He had no idea whether his father, who would have been in his 70’s, was still alive, much less where he lived.  All he knew was that, at the time he left the family, his father had been a brand new Baptist minister in a remote, rural, southern town.  So he searched for and found a database of Baptist ministers.  Lo and behold – he found his father’s name (all the more touching because it had been his own).  He was alive and still ministering, now to a much larger, southern congregation.  Without much ado, he called the church and when he reached the minister, he said, “I believe I am your son; my name is xxx.” 

*        *                  *                  *                  *                  *                 

Can you imagine the emotions on either side of that phone line?  I had goose bumps as Rob told me this story.  What feelings can you envision?  Guilt, grudge, hope, anxiety, worry, joy, “gotcha”?  Over the course of this and several subsequent conversations, the brother learned that his father had remarried.  His second wife knew that he had had a prior family, but none of their three adult daughters knew, nor did the congregation. The father decided to tell his family about the call from his estranged son.  Can you imagine that series of conversations!  Well, the upshot is that the whole family invited both brothers to come visit for a weekend.   

The big brother did go, with his wife and children.  They were welcomed with open arms.  The sisters were delighted to meet a brother they had never known.  The father and his wife extended invitations to spend Thanksgiving and Christmas, and started sending cards and checks to the grandchildren.  However, the man who told me the story, the younger brother, felt very uncomfortable with this.  In his view (and his mother’s), the father had abandoned the young family long ago when they needed him, and he didn’t feel the need to reconnect now.   Still, perhaps out of curiosity, perhaps under pressure from his brother, he did go one weekend to meet the family.  There, he formed two indelible impressions.  First, he was startled by the striking physical resemblance of his father and brother.  Second, he was severely disappointed that his father never apologized – never said the words.  So he returned to Houston, distributed the cards and checks to his children, but did not feel the need to re-establish a relationship with a man he had not remembered in the first place.

I’d like you to take a moment to put yourself in the shoes of these various characters, the father, the mother, the older and younger brothers, the second wife, and her daughters.  Some of you can relate very personally to this story, because of abandonment OF you or abandonment BY you.  Others of you can empathize.  What grudges have you held, or what apologies or forgiveness have you sought or granted?  *              *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  

Now, I’d like to move this from the personal to the theological and scientific.  Let’s consider the forgiveness teachings of the five major religions and some health and university studies.  In the interest of time, I’ll simplify each one with the full recognition that not all members of each faith believe my simplistic summary.  I’d like you to think about your own grudges and forgiveness experiences in light of each of these approaches.  Which one reflects your personal views and approaches?  Are there others you would like to try?  

Christianity teaches that humans are innately sinful, through Original Sin in the Garden of Eden, but that we are redeemed by God’s unending grace.  He is wholly merciful, and forgives us even before we forgive ourselves.  Still, it is important for us to admit our wrongs and solicit that clemency.  We can confess our sins directly to God.  If we seek absolution from a priest, it is God’s mercy he confers; not his own.  Jesus taught that when we are sinned against, we should forgive our transgressors 70 x 7 times, and that God will reward us for that.  I envision a model of Christian forgiveness is linear – a communication between the individual who sins or forgives and God, who pardons or rewards her. 

Judaism teaches that a sinner can and should confess sins against God to God, but that sins against other people need to be resolved between those people, as in the Hassidic story I read. God sort of recuses himself from that process.  Teshuvá is the key concept in the rabbinic view of sin, repentance, and forgiveness.  In it, repentance requires five elements: recognition of one's sins as sins (hakarát ha-chét'), remorse (charatá), desisting from sin (azivát ha-chét'), restitution where possible (peira'ón), and confession (vidúi).  Whereas the Christian model is linear, the Jewish construct is circular, because one must seek forgiveness from the one hurt, AND be forgiven, for the circle to be complete. 

 How many times do we hear apologies as though the words alone should end the conflict – “I said I’m sorry”, when in fact, the other person does not believe an insincere statement or is still too mad to accept a contrite apology?  Not only may each person have his own timeline for forgiving, but a verbal apology may not seem equivalent to what transpired.  Judaism teaches that appropriate restitution is fair and right.  This reminds me of some of Judge Ted Poe’s creative yet logical penalties, before he ran for congress, such as a drunk driver who had to pay child support when he killed a parent, or a thief who had to make car payments in restitution for the car he stole and wrecked. 

Islam, of course, adopted both Jewish and Christian elements into its own theology.  Like the latter, Allah is Merciful (127 times in the Koran) and Compassionate (115 times), but this quality is not guaranteed, as it is in Christianity.  For example, He does not extend his mercy to those who are, themselves, unmerciful to others or who refuse to repent of their sins.  Allah will accept the repentance we offer, and can release us from punishments if we express contrition later on, because He is patient.  As in Judaism, an apology should be accompanied by an appropriate offer of payment.  The one harmed has the right to request it, and can accept or decline what is offered.

Hinduism and Buddhism are markedly different from the three Monotheistic religions because they do not believe in a personal god at all.  In Hinduism, Brahman is impersonal.  It does not know that you exist.  It cannot hear, respond, or forgive.  Therefore, there is no need for prayer or atonement to an external Form.  The Hindi’s ultimate goal is to achieve transcendent peace, or moksha, which is like Nirvana in Buddhism.   The impediments to that peace are what westerners call sin, such as selfishness or pride, and both Hinduism and Buddhism see these as self-created, and potentially, self-diminished.  Those feelings that tend to make us most ill tempered are attitudes or feelings that bind us to our egos or our physicality.  Our goal should be to free ourselves from both.  Forgiveness is an important virtue because it helps us shed that ego.  When you forgive someone for hurting your feelings, you are admitting that your feelings are not really all that important in the scheme of things.  When you forgive yourself, you move along to a larger world in which you are not the center of attention – even your own!  Interestingly, at each of four stages toward moksha, or peace, forgiveness is important, but in a different way.  For example, at a lower level, forgiveness demonstrates kindness and empathy toward others (and ourselves). Later on, the choice to hold grudges and resentment indicate a person’s preference to cling to ego rather than advance spiritually to transcendence, where there is no ego. 

Buddhism’s teaching are similar in regards to forgiveness.  God is not part of it.  We suffer because of our own choices to cling to greed, anger, and delusions.  When we are lenient toward others, we become compassionate toward ourselves. Good karma includes accepting mistakes – ours and others.  Bad karma is creating bad feeling.  Rabbi Kushner, author of “Why Bad Things Happen to Good People,” said something that sounds very Buddhist: if after two days you still haven't forgiven something, now it has become your problem.  One of my favorite quotes on the subject of forgiveness and resentment is this:  Resentment is a poison you drink, hoping the other person will die!  In the Hassidic story I read earlier, God was the river. In Buddhism, life is a flowing river of constant change.  To hold a grudge against a person because of an event years ago is to create over and over an image of something that no longer exists.  It is to perpetuate an illusion. You are different now, the other person has changed, and the event itself has transmuted in the minds of those one who care enough to cling to it, and, sometimes, to change the story.    

Let’s wrap up this section by reviewing a few forgiveness studies in the scientific community.  Michael McCullough, director of research at National Institute for Healthcare Research said that recent studies suggest that people with vengeful personalities and a chronic desire to retaliate (because of their high hostility), may put themselves at much higher risk for early death through cardiovascular problems.  (Don’t you already think that when you witness road rage?) A University of Wisconsin study found that older people are more likely to forgive, and concluded that forgiveness is a form of wisdom learned in stages.  The University of Northern Iowa has developed psychological treatment plans for adult women who had been victims of childhood incest, certainly one of the most difficult transgressions to forgive.  The results indicated that those who went through forgiveness therapy experienced less anxiety and clinical depression than a control group, and that gains for the forgiveness group also persisted after the therapy ended.  Elderly women, according to the journal Psychotherapy, who scored well on a standard test of forgiveness traits had higher self-esteem and fewer episodes of anxiety and depression compared to those who scored poorly.  And finally, one study at the University of Miami at Ohio suggested that people whose partners had been sexually unfaithful might recover faster if they exacted some kind of emotional revenge on the guilty party. If you think about it, each of these examples correlates to one or another of the theological teachings. 

*                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *

Now, what might you glean from these teachings that you could apply to the story of the two brothers?

Christianity might say that the father should confess his mistakes to God and that God has already forgiven him.  The sons should forgive their father 70x7 times as Jesus taught, meaning, until they really, really mean it and can move on. 

Judaism might say that the father can have two separate conversations – one with God and one with his sons.  He was right to open his home and family to the boys, in reconciliation.  Perhaps the invitations and the birthday checks are a form of implied compensation, but he should explicitly ask forgiveness, and, perhaps, offer to pay back child support, which the sons (or mother) can accept or decline. 

Islam teaches that Allah would not forgive the dad until/unless he repented, and would expect both an apology and an offer of restitution. 

In contrast, both Hinduism and Buddhism say that no God is involved in this process.  There is only self.  The father and the sons should look within themselves and address whatever emotions hinder their spiritual development.  If these feelings include, for example, guilt on the father’s part, or resentment and anger, on the parts of the sons and mother, the individuals are keeping themselves from finding peace.  The river of life includes rocks and shoals of experience.   

Among the scientific studies are results that indicate that if Rob and his brother attributed any depression or anxiety or rage they may have suffered to being abandoned by their father, it was within their power to alleviate some of those conditions by forgiving him, rather than blaming him, and that doing so not only improves one’s health but also indicates a form of wisdom, gained with age. 

This sermon has included a lot of information.  I want to challenge you to apply it to yourselves.  I want you to write down two personal conflicts you have experienced that have bothered you for a long time.  In one, you want to forgive a person who hurt you.  In another, write down an incident for which you wish to be forgiven for harming someone else.  Now I want you to commit to apply one of the approaches you have heard today, and then monitor the effect of that commitment a week or more from now.

--------------------------------------------

If you are most comfortable with the Christian teachings, then ask God to forgive you.  He already has. Then forgive yourself. In addition, forgive your transgressor 70 x 7 times (which really means say it until you really mean it and believe it and can let it go). 

If the Jewish or Muslim perspective resonates with you, then pick up the phone or a pen, contact the person, apologize, and be prepared to offer some form of appropriate restitution – maybe a kindness or a repayment or a service.  He or she may or may not be prepared to accept your apology.  That’s his or her right.  Half of the value of this is for you.  Alternatively, if someone has hurt you, you have the right to be merciful and forgive him/her, but also the right to ask for an apology and fair compensation – whichever will close the circle and put it in the past.  Again, even if the person refuses, half this process is good for you. 

If the Buddhist or Hindu teachings make sense to you, then think of that flowing river and how much water has flowed since the incidents in your mind.  You are hurting yourself by dwelling on them.  You are drinking poison yourself.  Let go of both your guilt and your resentment to feel a sense of relief in your shoulders, or in your gritted teeth or in your despondency.  This is not as easy as it sounds.  It means giving up expectations that others should behave as you wish.  That’s your ego talking.  Don’t expect contrition, apologies, or payment.  Your peace of mind is all you can control.  It is up to you. Let go. 

If the scientific results are meaningful to you, review your health in light of your grudges.  Are you taking medications for depression, anxiety, stress, blood pressure or other cardiovascular ailments?   Do you tend to hold grudges or resentments or a persistent sense of victimization?  Are there any mental choices you can make that might introduce measurable physical improvements? Do you want to ask your doctor about this?          *                  *                  *                  *                  *                  *

In conclusion, it occurs to me that when one has first suffered a wrong or a tragic loss due to someone else, it's often pointless to speak of forgiveness. That often comes only with time and reflection, because forgiveness is not the same as forgetting.  Forgetting is easy. 

Forgiveness is all the harder because it may involve neither forgetting nor understanding.  It may require us to ignore who is right and wrong. It may necessitate giving up any hope of an apology.  Finally, it can deprive us of the pleasure of strong feelings, often long held, about our memories, our roles, and our sense of self.  How sensible, how human, that religions and psychologists and doctors and universities teach us to forgive others simply because it is good for us and good for those around us.  (end) 

     

Hagar's Prayer

(This sermon refers to several passages in Genesis, which are quoted at the bottom of this posting, for your reference)

The story of Hagar's expulsion by Abraham and Sarah is, to me, one of the most poignant in the Bible, and for additional, literary and cultural reasons, I find it fascinating, as well as touching.  A vulnerable woman,  foreign, enslaved, a mother - is rejected – ejected by people she knew from the community that protected her from ravages of the desert and the depredations of travelers from whom a single woman or even a single man, had little defense. They sent out to a death sentence, or possibly worse, in that unforgiving land with one loaf of bread and one skin of water.  Soon parched and starving, her choices more and more constrained, she resigns herself to inevitability and sets her son under the limited shade of a bush and removes herself some distance with the only hope left to her – to not live long enough to see her only child die.



Some of you, I know, have had to endure such heart wrenching experiences, yourselves.  Some of you have had to whisper that most fervent of prayers, “Please don’t let me outlive my child.”  A parent’s worst nightmare.  Some of you have been rejected – ejected by people you had known, loved, and trusted – a loved one like parent, spouse, or adult child who has cast you off.  Some of you have been abused by others in one form or another when you felt most vulnerable, and you took it when your options seemed severely limited.  Many of you have lost jobs, health, friendships and felt alone, abandoned, afraid. What happened to you?  What in Hagar’s terrible ordeal speaks to you?  



In the first version of the story, Sarah blames Hagar’s attitude for deserving subsequent harsh treatment.  Did you blame yourself, too?  Did you leave or consider leaving, only to return for more of the same treatment?  Why?  



In both versions, an angel appears and comforts Hagar by telling her of an ennobling future – that she will be blessed by a son, but he will be cursed as a warmonger doomed to fight his brothers.  In the first version, she returns to Sarah, for presumably more harsh treatment as she bears her son, and in the second version, her son and she never return, but strike out on their own.  She lives long enough to find him a wife, and in the final snippet, he lives long enough to father 12 sons who become the chiefs of the their own tribes.  In any of your travails, when have you encountered a personal angel – perhaps a mentor or friend or even a fictional character who said just what you needed to hear at a moment of your deepest despair? Alternatively, when have you been that angel to someone else?   I had an experience that combines both.  I had been fired from one job I hated and then laid off from a dot com and thought that maybe I’d be better off working for myself.   A man from church hired me for a writing/research project that helped get me started, for which I was very grateful.  Several years later, when I worked for another dot com, I was able to hire him for an IT project.  His wife told me years after that, that he needed that job at that time, as much as I had needed the one he gave me, a few years earlier.   I love the synergy that each of us was able to help the other at a time of need, without necessarily knowing how important it was at the time.  I’m willing to bet that you have been that angel for others, and that others have rescued you a time or two, too.  Please think about that, and be grateful for both. 



II          I’d like to talk about two other aspects of this story that are not as personally touching but that have long term cultural importance.   The first is literary.   The Bible is unique among discovered or retained ancient literature in the frequency of stories involving marginalized populations, like slaves, women, foreigners, and children who are named, pivotal characters.  If you think about it, most ancient literature is about gods and heroes, isn’t it?  Or kings and queens.  I don’t recall that Homer captured any touching moments with the slaves of Helen of Troy or Penelope of Ithaka, do you?  And that is a fair comparison, because those Greek stories were probably gathered together in written form near the time the Jewish tales were gathered into the books of Genesis, Exodus, and Numbers.  But the Bible tells stories not only of Hagar the slave, but Ruth, the Moabite daughter-in-law who loves her Jewish mother-in-law so much that after their husbands die, she travels with her out of her own country and back to Israel and works to support her.   So even if these stories don’t touch you personally, you can appreciate them as examples of a culturally distinctive literature. 



This story is significant theologically, too.  Although there are earlier stories in which God talks to Adam and Eve and Noah, this is the first in which an angel speaks to a human.  Not only is this inaugural conversation with a woman, but to a foreigner- not a Jew, and a slave.  The angel of God recognizes her and calls her by name!  So this is a powerful episode in the evolving sense that Judaism was moving from a  localized tribal religion, as in my clan has its family gods and your clan worships different gods, to a definite monotheism.  This angel or this god recognizes outsiders like Hagar, and she acknowledges him, even naming him, I see the God Who Sees me.  Finally, you probable recognized the phrasing with which the angel tells her she is pregnant as the same language the gospels of Matthew and Luke used for the annunciation of Jesus’ imminent birth.   The birth of Christ is foreshadowed by the son of a slave.     



It is for such reasons that this story, like that of the exodus from Egypt, were two that particularly resonated with Jewish and Christian slave populations throughout history.  The god of the slave holders was also the god of the enslaved, and miracles were available to them, too. 



III        The final point about this story that I’d like you to know is how this story may contribute to some of the antipathy between the Jews and the Arabs today.  You noticed of course that Ishmael’s destiny is described rather unattractively in the first version as “A wild-ass of a man he will be, against every man, and every man against him, setting himself to defy all his brothers.”  The final anecdote simply says, “He set himself to defy his brothers.”  Well, why would that be the end of the story, particularly for a man whose name means, “God Hears?”  It is because of his sons.  Remember he bears 12 sons who become 12 chieftans.  Well, where do Ishmael’s sons live?   You may not be up on your ancient geography to know Havilah and Shur, but you know what is east of Egypt:  Arabia, on the way to Assyria, which was the empire along the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers of contemporary Iraq. Havilah is associated, traditionally, with the area of southern Arabia, around Yemen.   So this Bible story depicts the progenitor of the 12 tribes of Arabia as a “wild-ass of a man, who sets himself to defy his brothers.”  Who is the only brother we know?  Isaac, whose son, Jacob fathers the 12 tribes of Israel.  Now Biblical literalists tend to interpret this as meaning that the Bible foresaw inevitable conflicts between the Israelites and the Ishmaelites, or Arabs, and it is Ishmael’s fault.  Others believe that such Bible stories were written after such conflicts existed, as a way of explaining and often justifying old feuds and hatreds.  There are many such stories in the Bible that defile the forefather of enemy tribes and nations in this way.  My favorite, because it is so awful, explains that the Israelites hate the Moabites and the Ammonites because their forefather was Lot, who had incest with his daughters, after they fled from Sodom and Gomorrah, and the ensuing babies grew up to found Moab and Ammon. 



Interestingly, though, the Muslim Arabs themselves have an entirely different version of this whole story, and it intersects at some points with ancient Jewish oral traditions, outside the Bible.  One element is that Hagar was not a slave.  She was an Egyptian princess whom Abraham married, along with Sarah, at a time and culture in which polygamy was not only legal but encouraged.  Her son, Ishmael, is listed 12 times in the Koran, as one of the prophets.  In the Muslim version, Abraham doesn’t abandon them to the desert but takes them through the desert.  Ishmael does cry from thirst and Hagar runs seven times between two hills to find water.  God hears the cries and creates a miraculous well.  Today, when Muslims go on their hajj, they recreate this story by running between two hills in Mecca seven times and then drinking water.  They also circle the Kaaba.  Tradition teaches that Adam built it, but Abraham and Ishmael rebuilt it on its old foundations.  Another difference between Jewish and Muslim stories is the sacrifice of Isaac in the Bible.  In the Koran, Abraham dreams that he was to sacrifice his son.  The boy is not named, but Muslim tradition holds that it was Ishmael, not Isaac.   This tradition is reinforced by the sacrifice of a lamb during the Hajj and elsewhere in the world.  Other oral traditions, in both Judaism and Islam tell of later interactions between Abraham and Ishmael, for example, how Abraham remained involved enough in Ishmael’s life to encourage him to divorce a first wife and keep a second one, and tell how Abraham gets together with both son and six more that he has by a third wife, after Sarah died.  



Since Ishmael is the forefather of Arabs, various tribes trace their lineage back to his sons and to himself, Mohammed, himself, included.  The name of Mohammed’s wife is the same as one of the wives of Ishmael, making them a prophetic couple foretold.





I hope this isn’t more than you ever wanted to know about Hagar.  You can tell that I find it a rich and provocative story for personal, literary, and intercultural reasons.  I hope that next time you hear her name, you will be less inclined to think of Hagar the Horrible cartoon figure and think of Hagar the tragic or Hagar the first woman in the Bible to engage an angel in dialogue, or Hagar, whose story shows the evolution of Judaism, from tribal religion to monotheism, or Hagar, the Matriarch of the Arab people. 
------------------------------
The following Bible passages are from the Jerusalem Bible English translation
Genesis 16
Abram’s wife Sarai had borne him no child, but she had an Egyptian slave named Hagar.  So Sairai said to Abram, “Listen now!  Since Yahweh has kept me from having children, go to my slave-girl.  Perhaps I shall get children through her.  Abram agreed to what Sarai had said.  Thus, after Abram had lived in the land of Canaan for ten years, Sari took Hagar, her Egyptian slave-girl and gave her to Abram as his wife.  He went to Hagar and she conceived.  And once she knew she had conceived, her mistress counted for nothing in her eyes.  Then Sarai said to Abram,”May this insult to me come home to you!  It was I who put my slave-girl into your arms, but now she knows that she has conceived, I count for nothing in her eyes.  Let Yahweh judge between me and you.”  Very well, Abram said to Sarai, “Your slave-girl is at your disposal.  Treat her as you think fit.”  Sarai accordingly treated her so badly that she ran away from her.
The angel of Yahweh met her near a spring in the wilderness, the spring that is on the road to Shur.  He said, “Hagar, slave-girl of Sarai, where have you come from and where are you going?”  “I am running away from my mistress, Sarai.” She replied.  The angel of Yahweh said to her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to her.”  The angel of Yahweh said, “I will make your descendants too numerous to be counted.”  “Then the angel of Yaheweh said to her, “Now you have conceived and you will bear a son, and you shall name him Ishmael, for Yahweh has heard your cries of distress.  A wild-ass of a man he will be, against every man, and every man against him, setting himself to defy all his brothers.” 
Hagar gave a name to Yahewh who had spoken to her:  “You are El Roi”, for she said, “Surely this is a place where I, in my turn, have seen the one who sees me?”  “This is why this well is called the well of Lahai roi, it is between Kadesh and Bered.    Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave to the son that Hagar bore the name Ishmael.  Abram was 86 (years old) when Hagar bore him Ishmael.
 Genesis 21: 9
 Now Sarah watched the son that Hagar the Egyptian had borne to Abraham, playing with her son, Isaac.  “Drive away that slave-girl and her son,” she said to Abraham; “this slave-girl’s son is not to share the inheritance with my son, Isaac.”  This greatly distressed Abraham because of his son, but God said to him, ”Do not distress yourself on account of the boy and your slave-girl.  Grant Sarah all she asks of you, for it is through Isaac that your name will be carried on.  But the slave-girl’s son I will also make into a nation, for he is your child, too.”  Rising early next morning, Abraham took some bread and a skin of water, and, giving them to Hagar, he put the child on her shoulder and set her away.  She wandered off into the wilderness of Beersheba.  When the skin of water was finished, she abandoned the child under a bush.  Then she went and sat down at a distance, about a bowshot away, saying to herself, “ I cannot see the child die.”  So she sat at a distance; and the child wailed and wept. 
But God heard the boy wailing, and the angel of God called to Hagar from heaven.  “What is wrong, Hagar?” He asked.  “Do not be afraid, for God has heard the boy’s cry where he lies.  “Come, pick up the boy and hold him safe, for I will make him into a great nation.”  Then God opened Hagar’s eyes and she saw a well, so she went and filled the skin with water and gave the boy a drink.    God was with the boy.  He grew up and made his home in the wilderness, and he became a bowman.  He made his home in the wilderness of Paran, and his mother chose him a wife from the land of Egypt. 
 -------------------------------------------------------
Genesis 25
Abraham gave all his possessions to Isaac.  To the sons of his concubines Abraham gave presents, and during his lifetime he sent them away from his son Isaac, eastwards, to the east country.  … Abraham breathed his last, dying at a ripe old age, an old man who had lived his full span of years, and he was gathered to his people.  His sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the cave of Machpelah. …
 These are the descendants of Ismael, the son of Abraham by Hagar, Sarah’s Egyptian maidservant.  Nebaioth, Kedar, Adbeel, Mibsam, Mishma, Dumah, Massa, Hadad, Tema, Jetur, NNaphish, and ledemah.  … Twelve chiefs of as many tribes.  The number of years Ishmael lived was 137.  Then he breathed his last, died, and was gathered to his people.  He lived in the territory stretching from Havilah to Shur, which is to the east of Egypt, on the way to Assyria.  He set himself to defy his brothers.