I
have full confidence that marriage counselors would be out of work if
engaged couples attempted to build something together (or share a
canoe or put up striped wallpaper). Let's just say that such
endeavors clarify the yin and the yang in a couple and those who
stick it out will last. In our case, because he can't cook and I
can't fly, we need each other, so we stick together. However, we
mutually agreed to never attempt future constructions together –
never ever.
The life of erstwhile city slickers, now telecommuters in a remote log cabin raising chickens, ducks, rabbits, and bees, making beer and wine, and raising vegetables and berries.
Friday, September 18, 2015
Permaculture: Dying Spruce = New Deck
Saturday, September 5, 2015
How Much Food Can a Part Time Gardener Raise in Alaska?
During WWII, Americans were encouraged
to grow “victory gardens” of fresh food in their yards as a
patriotic effort, and millions did, in back yards and on rooftops.
After the war, the number declined, but in recent years, home-grown
foods are enjoying a resurgence of interest among people who have
never previously grown anything but mold in the refrigerator. (Including me!) For
those whose source of food tends to be a delivery van or a drive up
window, the idea of growing food in the back yard (or window sill)
may seem daunting. It doesn't have to be. In the future I will
offer step by step articles for super easy seed starts to encourage
the beginning gardener, since my successes and failures are still fresh in my mind. But with this article, I hope to inspire
readers with the successes of an erstwhile terrible gardener.
Wild raspberries galore all summer! |
Since a packet of (hundreds of) seeds
costs about $2, a strawberry plant costs $1, a raspberry cane about
$5, and a fruit tree sapling $10 – 50, depending on age/size/type
(all these fruits are perennial – they last many years), the cost
and quality of home grown fruit and vegetables is much more
attractive than at a store. The cost of producing eggs and meat is
higher than at a big box store, but we can justify that for a number
of reasons I won't belabor here. My hope is that if I, a relative
newbie, can grow so much food, perhaps this article will inspire you
to start or expand your food raising efforts. (For more information
about raising chickens, ducks, rabbits, and honeybees, see other articles on
this blog).
Each section below lists the foods we
raise/make, some notes about successes and failures, and comment about what foods in
this category we still need to buy because we cannot raise/make them
ourselves. I hope you will feel encouraged to grow something you
can put in your next pizza or scrambled eggs.
Sweets: We tap birch trees for
sap in April/May (used in cooking and making beer) and harvest honey
in August/September (four hives).
Notes: Birch sap is less than
2% sugar, so it is a subtle replacement for water in oatmeal, coffee,
and beer. It is also chock full of vitamins, including calcium. We
collected 15 gallons last year from four trees in three days. Maple
syrup is MUCH more efficient than birch syrup. But since maples don't grow this far north, we are preparing to
collect 100 gallons from 14 trees over ten days in order to process a
single gallon of delectable birch syrup! We will also collect
additional gallons of sap for cooking and drinking. The sap needs to
be chilled, but the honey is shelf stable, forever.
Honey about to be extracted from the comb |
Our bees in Alaska do not overwinter so
we have to buy new queens and “starter colonies” each spring.
The first year, the bees spent more time building comb than making
honey, so we netted only two gallons from a hive. The second year
(with the existing comb), our honey harvest doubled. We do buy sugar
for baking, but with next year's sweet harvests, I will endeavor to
tweak recipes to use the sap and honey instead. I have learned that I can use honey instead of pharmaceutical products to cover a cut.
Shopping: We buy flavorings that do
not grow in a cold climate, like chocolate, vanilla, and coffee.
Sunday, August 30, 2015
Fire Prevention at Remote Properties (or any others)
Rural property owners generally pay
lower taxes than city people for the logical reason that they derive
fewer municipal services. That's a fair trade, isn't it? Among
services NOT available to many on-road, (and certainly not for
off-road) properties is subsidized fire protection. This has
implications not only for structural preservation but also for
insurance. Be sure to inquire about both before you buy or rent that
attractive remote property! Then, plan to take charge of your own
fire safety.

Whether your property has existing
buildings or you will build from scratch, plan to assess fire hazards
and find ways to reduce them through prudent use of: (a) firebreaks and landscaping,
b) hardscape, (c) flammable debris removal or storage, (d) well
marked and accessible roads and driveways (if on the road system),
(e) well positioned fire suppression systems (f) primary and
secondary methods to report the emergency, and, finally (g) exit
plans and provisions.
Examples of each below:
a) Firebreaks and Landscape:
The recommended width of a fire break is at least 30 feet around
buildings. (This is referred to as "defensible space zone 1") (However, since fire rises, buildings on a steep slope need to triple that distance below the structures). I have first hand knowledge of the reason. This summer,
the area of Willow, Alaska suffered a wildfire of several thousand acres.
Scores of buildings and vehicles were damaged. About 2,000 people
were evacuated. As we fly low over that area on a regular basis, and
then drive among its roads, we see clear evidence where the fire had
“jumped” narrow roads and driveways but had not crossed broad cul
de sacs, parking lots, or grass air strips. The clearing around
your buildings does not have to be paved or graveled – it can have
landscaping - but those plantings should be intelligently selected
and well maintained.
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Telecommute from a Remote Property (Problems and Solutions)
For
many years, my husband and I enjoyed working from home and traveling
for business, so our far flung clients rarely knew where we were.
They reached us by cell phone or email, and we met them occasionally
during the year. So when we decided to move full time from our
high-rise condo to our off-road, off-grid log cabin in the
middle of the Alaskan forest, our professional life was,
surprisingly, the least significant (of many!) adjustment we had to
make.
True,
we had to build the infrastructure to power Internet and telephony by
solar and wind power. And true, too, the communications service is
less robust and, occasionally, less reliable. But Bryan still smiles
and dials financial folks in investment banking and I still write
business documents and provide compliance services for the securities
industry. But the trade off is worth while: those early evening
hours we used to waste commuting across town to networking meetings
filled with service providers and job seekers are now allocated to a
kayaking happy hour on a lovely lake surrounded by mountains. What a wonderful
trade.
The
message I'd like to convey in this article is: Why live where you need to work instead of working where you want to live? For many
professions, telecommuting from home is an increasingly viable
option, so telecommuting from where you want that home to be, is,
too.
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Build a Private Airstrip Or Land on One? Think Twice
Let's
hypothesize that some Sourdough wants to build a grass airstrip on
his property so that his Cheechako buddies can visit. Below are
mistakes the former might make that the latter might encounter – to
his peril. The list should give prudent pilots plenty of food for
thought before they land on any private airstrip... or build one.
A
visiting flyer could encounter problems if the airstrip is:
- Built on soft or clay soil with no underlayment and no camber for drainage, soupy in rain, rutted after a prior friend landed or a moose walked through, uneven shifting due to permafrost and ice heave.
- Studded with rocks that are loosened by each visitor, pitting propellers and low winged aircraft.
- Too short for visiting airplanes, or long enough to land but too short for visitor take offs when temperatures or humidity rise (leaving Cheechako Charlie a stranded, and possibly unwelcome, visitor until the weather changes).
- In many parts of the country, and CERTAINLY in Alaska, the runway will be wet, slushy, and icy many times of year. As any car driver in similar situations can imagine, the rule of thumb for safe landings in these conditions is to multiply one's "normal" landing distance by 1.4 when wet, by 1.7 for snow, by 2.3 for standing water/slush and by a whopping 3.5-4.5 for ice. PLUS a 15% margin of error. So, for example, a Cessna 182 and 206 generally can land in 1400 feet. However, ski planes have NO BRAKES unless one adds them (a $2000 extra). A safe ski plane pilot would avoid an icy strip of less than 5600 feet, especially if there are trees, roads, or homes at the far end of the luge lane, or if the strip angles downward. The past two warm winters here made strips perilously icy. Pilots avoided our neighbor's strip in the woods all winter long. They stuck to the much larger (if still icy) lake.
- Wide enough for the owner's plane or experienced pilots but too narrow for occasional pilots or in cross winds.
- Contains a tricky curve, laterally or vertically!
- Built steeper than the recommended 2% grade lengthwise or greater than the 2.5 % camber widthwise, or it angles down instead of up for landings, or the lay of the land changes over time and is not regraded by the owner. Oriented downward, a 1% grade can increase a pilot's needed landing distance by 10%. 3% grade = 30%! And who can see that from the air?
- Obstructed on the ends, sides, or even middle of the strip – a downed tree, a piece of machinery, animals, trash, a windblown plastic chair.
- Oriented toward the prevailing wind in some seasons but not others. Positioned where mountains throw up quirky weather. Positioned where landings speed up because of common tailwinds.
- Infrequently maintained if the owner is not a frequent flyer. For example, the grass could be high enough to obscure obstructions, ruts or animals except right before the owner/pilot plans to fly. Wet grass contributes to hydroplaning, while dry grass can "grab" on landing. (Where we live, the wild grasses grow one foot per week to eight feet and then flop over everything nearby).
- A windsock at ground level surrounded by trees/buildings will not offer much useful information, and it may be contrary to conditions above trees ... where you need it.
- Finally, most airplane insurance does not cover landings on private residential strips. Those visits are strictly “at your own risk,” understandably! The factors that most grossly exaggerate the length required for a safe landing are strips that are slippery (from ice, snow, water), where landings are graded downhill with a tailwind.
The
owner of the airstrip may encounter problems he didn't contemplate,
either.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)